In article <20020506221551.A2437@wasabisystems.com>
lukem@wasabisystems.com wrote:

>   | > Replace <dev/sun/sun_boot.h> with <sys/bootinfo.h>, which is intended
>   | > to be more generic than ``bbinfo definitions for Sun-based systems''.
>   | 
>   | Is the name of `bootinfo.h' appropriate for this?
> 
> bootinfo.h? bootblock.h? bbinfo.h?  it's a hard call...
> do you feel something like <sys/bootblock.h> more appropriate? 

Well, I don't have any particular idea for the name
(bootblock.h seems better than bootinfo.h or bbinfo.h anyway),
but <sys/bootinfo.h> would cause some confusion because
some ports already have <machine/bootinfo.h> for other purpose.
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp