In article <20020506052756.79642B004@cvs.netbsd.org>
lukem@netbsd.org wrote:

> Module Name:	syssrc
> Committed By:	lukem
> Date:		Mon May  6 05:27:55 UTC 2002
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	syssrc/sys/dev/sun: Makefile
> 	syssrc/sys/sys: Makefile
> Added Files:
> 	syssrc/sys/sys: bootinfo.h
> Removed Files:
> 	syssrc/sys/dev/sun: sun_boot.h
> 
> Log Message:
> Replace <dev/sun/sun_boot.h> with <sys/bootinfo.h>, which is intended
> to be more generic than ``bbinfo definitions for Sun-based systems''.

Is the name of `bootinfo.h' appropriate for this?

This file contains `boot block info' (which is used by the primary boot
to load the secondary boot), and we already use `bootinfo' for
another one (to pass miscellaneous info from bootloader to kernel).
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp