>After reading this diff, I'm curious about some points:
>
>- Do we want to use pasv[] when truncation occured?
>
>- When server doesn't send '\r' nor ')', NUL termination depends on
>  bss initialization of pasv[], doesn't it?  So, it works only once.
>  I'm not sure if this is guaranteed.
>
>- The relationship with continuation line is unclear.  When server did
>  same thing above, next line will be copied.

	i agree the parser still looks problematical.

itojun