On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Jason R Thorpe wrote:

> Eee.  Please back this change out -- you have broken the INTENDED behavior!

Hm? It's intended to show up with the what(1) command in a NetBSD
kernel? Why is it so special when nothing else in the system is? (E.g.,
ipf used to have @(#) strings too, but they were taken out for the
same reason.)

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>  +81 3 5778 0123   de gustibus, aut bene aut nihil
	    "The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain."
			    -- G. Fitch