On 29-Dec-00 Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> We should really document exactly what we support on this
> front. There's a vague notion that a shared or remote /usr is
> supported, but we've never been clear exactly what that means.
> 
> Networks have gotten more complicated, and the tools needed to make
> them run have proliferated. Supporting, out of the box, remote /usr
> over all possible networking configurations strikes me as absurd. 

I have constantly used remote shared /usr since 1.3, and have been very vocal
about it's continued existence and support.  Perhaps we have never outright
said "it must exist", but every time something like this comes up, where it
gets broken, (assuming I notice) I've whined and moaned about it.

If this feature goes away suddenly.. I'm going to be very unhappy..

---
Tim Rightnour <root@garbled.net>
NetBSD: Free multi-architecture OS http://www.netbsd.org/
NetBSD supported hardware database: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/hw.cgi