"Soren S. Jorvang" <soren@wheel.dk> writes:
> Though, placing it in arch/mips seems rather random. Wouldn't it
> be better to just put all the machdep sysctl's in <sys/sysctl.h>?

*chuckle*  uh, what's the point of having arch-dependent or
machine-dependent headers if you don't put arch-/machine-dependent
definitions in them?


cgd
-- 
Chris Demetriou - cgd@netbsd.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.