On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 08:42:41AM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> > Move sysctl definitions from arch/mips to arch/foo.
> 
> This is a step _away_ from having a unified MIPS userland between archs,
> since each will now produce a different sysctl binary.  Can you please
> back this out?

I was unclear on how sysctl worked. I will back it out.

Though, placing it in arch/mips seems rather random. Wouldn't it
be better to just put all the machdep sysctl's in <sys/sysctl.h>?


-- 
Soren