In article <200003192058.PAA14557@ghost.whirlpool.com>,
	Andrew Gillham <gillhaa@ghost.whirlpool.com> writes:
> If we are going to start the 'ssh' .vs. 'ssh-socks' thing, then are we
> going to have 'apache' and 'apache-ipv4' or whatever?

IPv4 and IPv6 are supported by NetBSD 1.5's base distribution, socks is NOT.
So "ssh-socks" instead of "ssh6" is reasonable.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                            http://www.sighardstrasse.de/~tron/