Subject: Re: "tfs" and other filesystems with very short names
To: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <email@example.com>
Date: 09/22/1998 17:31:55
firstname.lastname@example.org (Greg A. Woods) writes:
> Of course if you look at the various sbin/mount_* directories in the
> user-land source:
and 'MNT_*' names, which should correspond directly.
These are the 'real' names of the file systems, the directory names
> If I were in my own universe and cared not for history I'd rename all
> the directories and symbol names in the kernel to have the "fs" suffix
> [ ... ]
at least for directory names, i think there's something to be said
i.e. all fses live in a single directory, and _don't_ have an 'fs'
> [Yes the "fs" suffix is redundant when you know you're dealing with
> filesystems, but "mount_n" and "mount_f", etc. or "fs/n" and "fs/f" look
> pretty funny, at least to me.]
funny how opinions differ...
Chris Demetriou - email@example.com - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.
Plug: Get your official NetBSD-1.3.2 CDROM set today! http://www.netbsd.com/