[src/trunk]: src/sys/dev/videomode spelling in comments

[dholland <dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/bac77e3e94c2
branches:  trunk
changeset: 327942:bac77e3e94c2
user:      dholland <dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date:      Fri Mar 21 22:00:00 2014 +0000

description:
spelling in comments

diffstat:

 sys/dev/videomode/vesagtf.c |  12 ++++++------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diffs (54 lines):

diff -r 01c21fd9ab84 -r bac77e3e94c2 sys/dev/videomode/vesagtf.c
--- a/sys/dev/videomode/vesagtf.c       Fri Mar 21 20:54:13 2014 +0000
+++ b/sys/dev/videomode/vesagtf.c       Fri Mar 21 22:00:00 2014 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $NetBSD: vesagtf.c,v 1.2 2013/09/15 15:56:07 martin Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: vesagtf.c,v 1.3 2014/03/21 22:00:00 dholland Exp $ */
 
 /*-
  * Copyright (c) 2006 Itronix Inc.
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
  * Note that I have heavily modified the program for use in the EDID
  * kernel code for NetBSD, including removing the use of floating
  * point operations and making significant adjustments to minimize
- * error propogation while operating with integer only math.
+ * error propagation while operating with integer only math.
  *
  * This has required the use of 64-bit integers in a few places, but
  * the upshot is that for a calculation of 1920x1200x85 (as an
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
 #ifdef _KERNEL
 #include <sys/cdefs.h>
 
-__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: vesagtf.c,v 1.2 2013/09/15 15:56:07 martin Exp $");
+__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: vesagtf.c,v 1.3 2014/03/21 22:00:00 dholland Exp $");
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/param.h>
 #include <sys/systm.h>
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@
      *
      * Finally we multiply by another 1000, to get value in picosec.
      * Why picosec?  To minimize rounding errors.  Gotta love integer
-     * math and error propogation.
+     * math and error propagation.
      */
 
     h_period_est = DIVIDE(((DIVIDE(2000000000000ULL, v_field_rqd)) -
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@
      *  [V FIELD RATE EST] = 1000000000 / [H PERIOD EST] / [TOTAL V LINES]
      *
      *  This is all scaled to get the result in uHz.  Again, we're trying to
-     *  minimize error propogation.
+     *  minimize error propagation.
      */
     v_field_est = DIVIDE(DIVIDE(1000000000000000ULL, h_period_est),
        total_v_lines);
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@
      *
      *  The ending result is that our ideal_duty_cycle is 256000x larger
      *  than the duty cycle used by VESA.  But again, this reduces error
-     *  propogation.
+     *  propagation.
      */
 
     ideal_duty_cycle =