Subject: Re: drobne postrehy - 2.0rc5 amd64
To: Pavel Cahyna <pavel.cahyna@st.mff.cuni.cz>
From: netbsd <netbsd@eq.cz>
List: regional-cs
Date: 12/05/2004 19:53:13
Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> Na to premountovani bych se nadale vykaslal, o tom uz vime ze nefunguje
> tak jak ma. Zda se ze ani sync po teto operaci nefunguje. Zajimavejsi je
> to po tom prebootovani. Muzete prosim poslat disklabel? (vystup prikazu
> disklabel wd0). 

19:19:57 root@tyan:/tmp/pkgsrc# disklabel wd0
# /dev/rwd0d:
type: unknown
disk: WDC WD740GD-75F
label:
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 16
sectors/cylinder: 1008
cylinders: 143384
total sectors: 144531250
rpm: 3600
interleave: 1
trackskew: 0
cylinderskew: 0
headswitch: 0           # microseconds
track-to-track seek: 0  # microseconds
drivedata: 0

16 partitions:
#        size    offset     fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
  a:  10486224        63     4.2BSD   1024  8192 46400  # (Cyl.      0*- 
  10403*)
  b:   2097648  10486287       swap                     # (Cyl.  10403*- 
  12484*)
  c: 144531187        63     unused      0     0        # (Cyl.      0*- 
143384*)
  d: 144531250         0     unused      0     0        # (Cyl.      0 - 
143384*)
  e: 104857137  12583935     4.2BSD   1024  8192 46648  # (Cyl.  12484*- 
116508)
  f:  27090178 117441072     4.2BSD   1024  8192 46552  # (Cyl. 116509 - 
143384*)
19:20:02 root@tyan:/tmp/pkgsrc#

Hmmmmmm, rpm by melo byt 10000 ...

Jeste kus z messages:

Dec  5 17:37:05 tyan /netbsd: wd0 at atabus2 drive 0: <WDC WD740GD-75FLA1>
Dec  5 17:37:05 tyan /netbsd: wd0: drive supports 16-sector PIO 
transfers, LBA48 addressing
Dec  5 17:37:05 tyan /netbsd: wd0: 70571 MB, 143384 cyl, 16 head, 63 
sec, 512 bytes/sect x 144531250 sectors
Dec  5 17:37:05 tyan /netbsd: wd0: 32-bit data port
Dec  5 17:37:05 tyan /netbsd: wd0: drive supports PIO mode 4, DMA mode 
2, Ultra-DMA mode 6 (Ultra/133)
Dec  5 17:37:05 tyan /netbsd: wd0(satalink0:2:0): using PIO mode 4, 
Ultra-DMA mode 6 (Ultra/133) (using DMA data transfers)


> Taky jsem si vsiml ze nepouzivate softdeps, to rozbaleni musi byt hrozne
> pomale, ne? Nemuze to byt tim, ze se ten disk ze sameho seekovani zblazni?

:-) tak to nevim. Pomale to je, ale da se to vydrzet. Softdeps chci 
zkusit, az bude vsecko v poradku v 'stabilni/BSD-lety_proverene' 
konfiguraci :-)
Stejne je nebudu moci mit vsude, nechci prijit kvuli vypadku proudu o 
postu (qmail), a tedy potrebuju, aby tohle chodilo za kazde situace dobre.
Myslite vazne, ze by rozbaleni pkgsrc archivu na defaultnim fs bez 
softdeps melo delat NetBSD problemy? Nebo jste to myslel tak, ze tohle 
by byl problem pro jakykoliv disk? Tohle je novy, ve sve kategorii 
pomerne drahy disk ...

r.