Subject: Re: dom0 kernel immediate reboot?
To: Sarton O'Brien <email@example.com>
From: Christoph Egger <Christoph_Egger@gmx.de>
Date: 09/14/2007 13:17:10
On Friday 14 September 2007 12:15:38 Sarton O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:24:19 pm Juan RP wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:30:11 +0300
> > Mikolaj Golub <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:13:40 +1000 Sarton O'Brien wrote:
> > >
> > > SO> I just realised I don't know how to tell what version of ffs I am
> > > SO> using.
> > >
> > > You can use dumpfs(8) for this.
> > And scan_ffs(8).
> Umm ... which one is right??
> $ df /dev/wd0a
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail %Cap Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a 198831 45824 143066 24% /
> $ dumpfs /dev/wd0a|grep -i ffs
> cylgrp dynamic inodes 4.4BSD sblock FFSv2 fslevel 4
> $ scan_ffs /dev/wd0
> Disk: WDC WD800JD-75M
> Total sectors on disk: 156250000
> FFSv1 at 63 size 410256, last mounted on /
> Now I'm just lost :P
> Seriously though is there something else I can use to point the finger at
> which one is wrong?
dumpfs is correct. scan_ffs was imported from OpenBSD at a time, there
was no FFSv2 support in OpenBSD. Now OpenBSD supports FFSv2.
=> scan_ffs needs re-imported.