Subject: Re: kernel: supervisor trap asynchronous system trap, code=0
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/05/2007 21:33:00
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:57:49PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > anyway, please don't call ras_lookup with interrupt disabled.
> > OK. I just wanted to make sure the new context was fully installed before
> > re-taking interrupts. I didn't notice a C function was being called.
> can you fix it?
Sorry, I forgot about it. I commited the change. It compiles, but I can't
really test it for now.
> i'm still not sure why taking interrupts here is a bad thing.
> have you investigated it since then?
Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference