[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: linux domU's and partitioning
- To: Undisclosed.Recipients: ;
- Subject: Re: linux domU's and partitioning
- From: Sarton O'Brien <sobrien%roguewrt.org@localhost>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 01:38:00 +1100
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 01:23, david l goodrich wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:57:04AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > It's possible that this has changed with Xen3.?With Xen2 I'm sure using
> > 0x300 didn't work; the linux kernel simply didn't read the partition
> > table from the virtal disk.
> Wait, 0x300 actually means something? What does it mean? I've
> just been numbering the disks 0x1, 0x2, etc... the galaxy hasn't
> exploded yet, so i figured i was okay...
Maybe it was the beer but I only caught onto that reference after I posted.
Similarly, I've been using just 0, 1, 2 etc.
I know under a linux dom0 you have to reference this correctly in either hex
or as a device but maybe it means something to a linux domU from a NetBSD
Are you running any linux domUs with this config?
Main Index |
Thread Index |