Subject: Re: isolated "internal" network?
To: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>
From: Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>
List: port-xen
Date: 09/14/2006 16:34:43
--Ll0BBk1HBk/f94B0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:23:41AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>=20
> I'm thinking that something should read any packets that end up
> getting sent and discard them; this feels cleaner than having them
> fill up in a queue and get dropped.
Sent by whom? A tap device that is not opened is like an unconnected
Ethernet device. The fact that it is bridged to another only means
that you have a permanent MAC address, as well as an IP address if
you wish, on that bridge.
It's really no different to having an additional, unconnected Ethernet
device in the system.
--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"You could have made it, spitting out benchmarks
Owe it to yourself not to fail"
Amplifico, Spitting Out Benchmarks, Hometakes Vol. 2, 2005.
--Ll0BBk1HBk/f94B0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBRQlog9goQloHrPnoAQLKXQgAjMzjc9o+i/ym9DsEHwF9G0Yo5zZSkZnd
6cP95ELFkIoVz09FpDnoUmv/VpOgrDTA1+LeJr4Zhs9dEXewmh5s8dtdXBCgqWxV
mrhkUSuicxZQ+b6tTlQ0GcJ8FfiGEsBbgP/6xPq/MHuCTxj7h+bXkwXvadYpO2k9
yEpRG+llkBa7fLUHe8271MDyfRByiZMQRstPgFJQcMkxC0xliV+CEMp7Rxe2OQTc
4yyurKwxnV2Ex0ubCQGGwnkPw5lU4/7++Pg+TsuI/RAhXCjFybq7dCelTt3wuvTu
WwOe32Y+oDLKZxLafr0tZfkL5lBwg/b3Y74aaW598/Fq6kMd0ss2Mg==
=ulf/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Ll0BBk1HBk/f94B0--