--VSJGZE3ajDCqFLUt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 07:26:22PM +0200, Joel CARNAT wrote:
> I have to triple-check (google give YES and NO answers) but it seems
> my Dell D620 has VT-enabled (with a CoreDuo T2300).

Well, there are two versions of the CoreDuo T2300;  the T2300E doesn't
support VT.  We should probably print the flag in dmesg but it will add
silliness to an already overloaded identcpu.c...

> Does NetBSD/xen3 already supports virtualization via VT-enabled chip ?

I don't think so.  I've intended to try for a while, but haven't
found the time yet.  I do know, however, that NetBSD doesn't run in
a HVM domU (blame it on the qemu backend).

> If not, which place does this feature have in to xen3 TODO list ?

That depends if anyone is working on it.  You can always try and donate
a VT (or SVM which is the AMD counterpart)-enabled system to Manuel with
hope it could speed up the process :-)

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--VSJGZE3ajDCqFLUt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBRQGrc9goQloHrPnoAQIdxAf/SiVXGMhsiiyXfoYrs4wSoETyTICI6p5S
IuR5kossL8Ul1sQl7Gon40wr+DW+WUs8eU9ZDVNh/diQMqcpRTirebY8R0XnXI+H
XgrdMjfhsgvkyk5gH+3iEPzwtPeaVbb3zoAzNE1Eq8I82K3fK4Yy0xTa6rDW0LVr
Ei7AeSp1XjW5/JvXTtVEhL3hFHu1DERx+jpQ7jWQw7oC+1Jd/ipVtNc+eNcJ69OU
GIQgbOLOdTshTBj3memMd51J/9wEg8AqhOomMoTZ87CYRE0ubzjPAHOG8e7oGGs4
z2Gn4Zk5ZlmFAtbADEe35XMEM0+TuZVxbUXDNSepJh3jgFJcznoQCQ==
=xsQJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VSJGZE3ajDCqFLUt--