Subject: Re: Xen3 update
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
From: Jeff Rizzo <riz@NetBSD.org>
List: port-xen
Date: 03/07/2006 10:21:00
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig0077420A0A0D91CF0ACD1391
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just commited some of my current work on Xen-3.0 support.
> This include xenbus (the interface to xenstore) and a network frontend
> driver. I also added a kernel config file (XEN3_U).
>  =20

Manuel, thanks for all your work on this!  I do have a couple questions
regarding the shipped kernel configs, though...

- since XENU and XEN3_U share most config information, shouldn't they
both be created in terms of a file they include with all the common bits
factored into a single file?  We've been having quite a proliferation of
similar-but-not-quite-the-same configs, and it would be nice to only
have one place to change things.

- (off topic for the current change, but still curious)  Since a domU
can't run an X server, should the XENU configs have "options INSECURE"
by default?=20

+j



--------------enig0077420A0A0D91CF0ACD1391
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRA3PEbOuUtxCgar5AQOWwAQAqtbXy1PHVyVuf+VgqNj9BebsbV2uAcO2
PqV2MlGWqsf4JF7m4+n/dgPABIM7kNLwo0NvN0NE/+qLBJgaPLszvPGFYTteHcck
G76UhdrhzlP/7eME4U86eAldoKH5VdPvJQ7OyHEgQP5oa6L0uoT/az5ex77/M2Og
CkuWZ9/FVnQ=
=sOwO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig0077420A0A0D91CF0ACD1391--