Re: split pow(4)

[makoto%hauN.ORG@localhost (Minoura Makoto)]

// Yeah, it was originally written by me more than 15 years
// ago (my first kernel code! wow!). thanks for improving it.

Perhaps, pow(4) is not a pseudo device.  If we ignore
backward compatibility some part of pow(4) job should
pushed out to the userland (via sram(4)); the remaining part
could go to rtc(4), or it's child device?

-- 
Minoura Makoto <makoto%hauN.org@localhost>