[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: split pow(4)
// Yeah, it was originally written by me more than 15 years
// ago (my first kernel code! wow!). thanks for improving it.
Perhaps, pow(4) is not a pseudo device. If we ignore
backward compatibility some part of pow(4) job should
pushed out to the userland (via sram(4)); the remaining part
could go to rtc(4), or it's child device?
Minoura Makoto <makoto%hauN.org@localhost>
Main Index |
Thread Index |