Port-x68k archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: xvfb not built on vax and x68k?

David Brownlee wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Patrick Finnegan wrote:

On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Brad Parker wrote:
David Brownlee wrote:
    objections to making those two ports consistent with all
    the others so all NetBSD ports build the Xvfb virtual
    framebuffer X server?

If it balloons out the build times I'd prefer not, at least on the
vax port.  None of the vaxen I use have frame buffers.

Well, I think the point of xvfb is that it doesn't require or use a
framebuffer in the machine.

    Yup, exactly. The relative additional time for a build with
    and without xvb is going to be marginal - if you want to
    save build time you should skip building X11 altogether,
    or crossbuild from a faster box. Given that x68k is going
    to have xvfb added that would leave vax as the odd port

You are aware that "marginal" might very well mean days here?


Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt%softjar.se@localhost             ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index