Re: Issues with compiler failures

[Johnny Billquist <bqt%update.uu.se@localhost>]

On 2019-03-22 18:04, Silas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:07:55AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > An easier option would be to make pcc usable and accept it leads to some
> > slightly reduced functionality (i.e. no groff, atf and libexecinfo in
> > the base build due to missing c++ support).
>
> This sounds interesting.  I just download pcc-20170101 (the latest?) and 
> there is an arch/vax directory with stuff within.  The $Id$ keyword of 
> arch/vax/code.c  even blames ragge for the latest commit :-)
>
> Isn't this usable?

As far as I can remember, there are still some issues meaning it might 
not compile everything under NetBSD correctly. Not to mention the lack 
of C++.

  Johnny

--
Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt%softjar.se@localhost             ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol