Port-vax archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Native builds?

> On Sep 12, 2018, at 9:56 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:42:17AM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>> That's unfortunate.  The gcc development process isn't that hard; for
>> bugfixes to live (and rot) in a local repository rather than going to
>> the gcc project isn't a good solution.
> Right. It always works good for me when the maintainer is active/responsive,
> e.g. I never have trouble getting sparc fixes integrated.
> But for generic NetBSD changes no gcc commiter feels responsible (or able to
> review), and for VAX changes they point at Matt :-/

It's certainly possible for a port to have more than one maintainer, so if there are volunteers for that it might help accelerate things.

> If you can help with finding peers, I'd be happy to try again. But I am not
> going to subscribe to gcc-patches.
> FWIW, the main (non VAX specific) tickets are: 58397 and 58381.
> Martin

gcc tickets?


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index