Subject: Re: Problem and fix for systat/top/ps
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 03/13/2007 21:48:06
In article <45F714B3.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Johnny Billquist <email@example.com> wrote:
>We really should have GCC always return true for finite() I guess, since
>that's what the function does anyway, and then gcc could optimize correctly.
>But it seems we need someone with knowledge of gcc to fix a number of
>issues that we have at the moment...
>If just gcc would work right for us, then I think we should actually
>have a fairly good base at the moment for the VAX.
In real.c if (exp == 0) in all the decode_vax_?() functions don't put
anything in the r-> stuff, they just leave it 0'ed. Is that ok?
I understand exp == 0 means really -128, but...