Subject: Re: timecounters and microtime on vax
To: Garrett D'Amore <garrett_damore@tadpole.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: port-vax
Date: 09/06/2006 21:13:59
On Sep 6, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Of course we could always doe the first thing, and add better
> timecounters back in later, if someone misses having a more accurate
> microtime().
Accurate microtime() is actually fairly important for e.g. benchmarks,
which, believe it or not, people do run on the VAX from time to time.
-- thorpej