Subject: Re: Looking for various LCSPX model strings
To: Blaz Antonic <blaz.antonic@siol.net>
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
List: port-vax
Date: 07/15/2004 18:11:29
--xiGzRFbP+7h+smMw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2004-07-15 16:25:42 -0700, Blaz Antonic <blaz.antonic@siol.net>
wrote in message <40F71276.3585@siol.net>:
> > Quite easy: any dynamic netblock should be blacklisted on any list.
> What kind of dumb idea is that ? Many people are stuck with dynamic IP
> allocation (24 hour reset because ISP thinks that will prevent people
> from keeping the link up all the time and free some ATM bandwidth) so
> they shouldn't be allowed to use their own MX ? Instead of preventing
> few problems which can be avoided in other ways (look below) this causes
> lots of problems.

Don't be your own MX then, but let it deliver to a "real" MX and post
messages by sending them to your ISP's relay. That's IMHO The Right
Thing (TM).

MfG, JBG

--=20
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B=FCrger" | im Internet! |   im Ira=
k!
   ret =3D do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TC=
PA));

--xiGzRFbP+7h+smMw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA9qyxHb1edYOZ4bsRAim6AJ9B5IW3nk2gu7e80LdNqqIJjCJOSgCfRojm
z8MtrCxHJyBaNsOfMA5AG6A=
=JGcu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xiGzRFbP+7h+smMw--