On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:29:38PM -0400, John Klos wrote:
> 
> I seriously doubt that ANY email client will ever duplicate the
> functionality of Outlook. Its ability to run foreign code is unparalleled.
> Even if someone can duplicate that, building a security system into Unix
> to allow the email client to have unfettered access to all of the system's
> resources is a daunting task in itself, and could take years to duplicate.

this has .sig written all over it. ;)

> I tried simh on a 1466 MHz AMD system running NetBSD, but found that my
> VAXStation 4000/60 was far faster. So I'm sticking with the real thing for
> bulk package builds until a more optimised version of simh becomes
> available.
> 
> In my opinion, the performance isn't there yet except for experimental
> things.

hmmmmm, on well.  guess i'll go with other options then.  that would have
been cool to do though. :)

-brian
-- 
"You know, evil comes in many forms, be it a man-eating cow or Joseph Stalin.
But you can't let the package hide the pudding. Evil is just plain bad! You
don't cotton to it! You gotta smack it on the nose with the rolled up newspaper
of goodness! Bad dog! Bad dog!"		-- The Tick