Subject: Re: NetBSD/pdp10 ?
To: Eric Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Julius Sridhar <email@example.com>
Date: 03/05/2002 12:37:21
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> > | What better way to exercise the portability of NetBSD? We've got
> > 32-bit | and 64-bit archictures sorted. Certainly there would be some
> > challenges | left with 36-bit support, no? Given the availability of
> > several PDP-10 | emulators and the work on GCC, I don't see why it
> > couldn't be done.
> > Lack of a real MMU is probably going to cause problems, especially
> > since UBC requires MMU functionality.
> Only a problem on a PDP-6 (166 processor) or KA10. The KI10, KL10, and
> KS10 processors all have a real MMU. Even the KA10 sometimes had an
> added MMU, the BBN Pager.
I don't think there will ever be a PDP-6 running UNIX, due to the rarity
of the system.