On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:30:08PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 03:48:13PM -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
> > Sigh, the vsbus files are also mid-uvm/vm changeover. This is rapidly 
> > becoming too much change in my environment to track. Does anyone have a 
> > preference for new driver targets ? 1.6 or 1.5? Is the use of UVM going 
> > into the 1.5 release or is it staying in mainline? Should I use the vsbus 
> 
> I don't know for the others, but UVM has been in current for some time,
> and 1.5 will use *only* UVM. The old VM bits have been removed from the tree.

To be precise, the only remaining bits where some header files with (formerly)
common (between MACH VM and UVM) definitions. They where moved to uvm/uvm*.h
files, and the vm directory was removed.

Regards,
	-is

-- 
 * Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from
   smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of
   smart terminals.  -- obs@burnout.demon.co.uk (obscurity)