Subject: Viking Qxx (was Re: VAX 4000/300)
To: None <port-vax@netbsd.org>
From: Aaron J. Grier <agrier@poofygoof.com>
List: port-vax
Date: 06/29/2000 21:15:19
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 10:02:25AM -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:

> I would avoid a Viking Qxx type controller on the 4000 only because it
> seems to waste a lot of the CPU's time (This is only anecdotal
> evidence however, I replaced one with a CMD 220 and I/O performance
> increased about 50% and load averages decreased.)

so I take it the viking Qxx are supported, then?

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agrier@poofygoof.com