> Hi !
> 
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, John A. Maier wrote:
> > >It is, I have one here. Without the cache support it's painfully slow.
> > >I'd pay real money if it would drum up the necessary docs to get that
> > >working.
> > 
> > Does the 4000/60 and 90 have the same lack of cache support?
> 
> Nope, they are Mariah/NVAX/based, the VLC is SOC-based. I did the VLC port, the
> 4000/60 and /90 were done by someone else. (I think Ragge did much of it).
> 
Yep, I wrote the CPU support for both the /60 and the /90 machines.
The cache should be working just fine in both of them.

-- Ragge