Subject: Re: sun3 port different then many others
To: None <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
From: Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. <bsd@hawkmountain.net>
List: port-sun3
Date: 06/03/2003 11:03:44
>Delivered-To: port-sun3@netbsd.org
>To: port-sun3@netbsd.org
>Cc: tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp
>Subject: Re: sun3 port different then many others
>From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 23:21:45 +0900
>
>In article <200306030513.h535DF83017825@fury.hawkmountain.net>
>bsd@hawkmountain.net wrote:
>
>> I also find it interesting that there is a common sun68k directory, which
>> has many of the structures, etc that would make porting this easier, but
>> that is for Sun-2, not sun3 (sun3 only uses the sun3 and m68k dirs, where
>> I think the Sun-2 port uses sun2, m68k, and sun68k dirs).
>
>Maybe sun3 and sun3x could switch to use bus_space stuff under
>sun68k dirs, but there are many drivers to be rewritten to
>adapt it.

The sun2 port I think requires all three dirs... sun2, m68k, and sun68k,
correct ?

I assume that in comparison to the sun2 port, the sun3 directory fills
the roles of the sun2 and sun68k dirs ?

-- Curt

>---
>Izumi Tsutsui
>tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp