Subject: Re: sun3 port different then many others
To: None <jeremy@baymoo.org>
From: Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. <bsd@hawkmountain.net>
List: port-sun3
Date: 06/03/2003 03:13:18
Does this mean that the sun2 port is more up to date ?  (it seems to
have that structure rather than the one the sun3 port has)

Also, of interest I see it builds with -msoft_float ... shouldn't it
have -m68881 ?

What would be involved in bringing the sun3 port up to speed with the
way the rest of the ports work ?  (I'm guessin it would be a quite a bit
of work)  Is there any docs on the old structure vs the new structure ?


-- Curt

>Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Jeremy Cooper <jeremy@baymoo.org>
>X-X-Sender: <jeremy@ziggy.local>
>To: "Curtis H. Wilbar Jr." <bsd@hawkmountain.net>
>cc: <port-sun3@netbsd.org>
>Subject: Re: sun3 port different then many others
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>
>
>On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:
>
>> In particular, I'm stuck on:
>>
>> 1. No bus_space_tag_t type
>> 2. No bus_space_mmap function
>> 3. No bus_addr_t
>> 4. No BUS_SPACE_MAP_LINEAR define
>>
>
>Curt, I'm sorry you're having so many problems.  They all stem from one
>cause: the sun3 port is a bit out of date.  People haven't worked on it
>for a while, meanwhile, the rest of NetBSD has marched forward.
>
>The problem you mention above is due to the fact that the "bus DMA"
>framework to which these functions belong was never incorporated into the
>sun3 port.  No one has attempted to port a driver to the sun3 for a good
>while now; hence, your initiative is stirring up long settled dust and
>revealing the oversight.
>