Subject: Re: NetBSD-1.3.3 port available for sun-3 boxen?
To: J. Maynard Gelinas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Brownlee <email@example.com>
Date: 01/14/1999 16:17:43
If you want to compile a -cuurent sun3 snapshot I'm more
than willing to get it uploaded to ftp.netbsd.org for you :)
-=- Why _do_ we crucify ourselves? -=-
On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, J. Maynard Gelinas wrote:
> Boy, it sure would have saved me some time if I'd had recent binaries
> to install instead of having to figure out lib and kernel dependency
> issues by asking stupid questions on the list. :-^ <*cough!*>
> Unless 1.3.3 supports the new 1.3I UVM kernel I'd recommend to Robert
> that he just recompile to -current. I had poor results with 1.3.2 and the
> distribution kernel, and anyway it doesn't support a color framebuffer.
> I'm just going to recompile everything up to -current... Maybe I should
> arrange to upload the binaries to incoming? I notice there's no -current
> release for the 3 or 3x over at ftp.netbsd.org.
> > I would expet it means the person who comitted to buulding the
> > sun3 images did not manage to complete the build in time.
> > I wqould definitely expect there to be a sun3 entry in the 1.4
> > release (whenever that comes). In the meantime 1.3.2 is probably
> > your best bet.
> > David/absolute
> > -=- "Give me one last video, just dressed in black" -=-
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Robert D. Keys wrote:
> > > Is there a sun-3 port for the NetBSD-1.3.3? I did not see such a tree
> > > in the archives. Does that mean there won't be a sun3 port?
> > >
> > > Bob Keys
> > >