Re: Someone using COMPAT_SVR4(_32) ?

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:01:14AM +0200, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
> Martin,
> 
> 6.0.6 sparc64, 6.1.5 sparc64, 7.1 sparc64 (all GENERIC), fail with the same
> behavior (meaning, same ktrace ouput) given the same payload (sparc
> solaris 2.6), ktrace shows:

OK, 7.1 definitively has the fix I was thinking about, so this is something
else.

Martin