re: PCU panic on V240

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

i've very confused.  when did sparc64 start to use PCU?

> The softint handler is called from interrupt context and this should not
> happen.

software interrupts should expect cpu_intr_p() to be false, but
cpu_softintr_p() to be true.

> This may be related to a recent change where PCU now uses softserial
> instead of softclock.

see my first question.

are you confusing subr_xcall.c and subr_pcu.c?


.mrg.