[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: V240 Status?
>>> Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:21:44PM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > So its not V240 specific. As high priority calls are rare (only subr_pcu.c,
> > and NPF through subr_pserialize.c used it so far) it is quite possible they
> > were never tested.
> I'm pretty sure I tested back then, but I am not 100% sure right now.
> I'll have a look.
I think sparc64_ipi_ccall in mp_subr.S is suspicious.
If it is called directly from interrupt_vector in locore.s, it
requires something like TRAP_SETUP() or INTR_SETUP() to prepare
stack and others.
-- Takeshi Nakayama
Main Index |
Thread Index |