Re: Problems with top

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Aug 19, 12:45pm, martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Problems with top

| On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:18:05AM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote:
| > It doesn't go wrong, we get what is defined in param.h:
| > 
| > % uname -m
| > sparc64
| > % uname -p
| > sparc
| 
| Sorry, read it vice versa - this looks correct, even if running 32bit, we
| still can execute v9 instructions.

uname -p should be sparcv9 then... But we don't do this (otherwise
we would have uname -p print i686 etc).

| Why does top test MACHINE instead of MACHINE_ARCH?

uname -m == (struct utsname *)->machine

top is right.