--RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 14 2005 - 08:28, Michael-John Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:01:51PM -0400, Michael wrote:
> > Hmm, I have an ohci and an esiop card in my U10, both deliver
> > considerably more than 200kB/s, so I don't think we have a problem with
> > the Simba bridge.
>=20
> I was thinking more of a bad interaction between the Simba and the onboard
> bridge on the qfe (a problem that is perhaps not evident with cards witho=
ut
> an onboard bridge). I also have an esiop(4) that gives more than 200K/s in
> my Ultra 5 :)
>=20
> Joel - what performance do you get from the onboard hme(4)? I upgraded my
> Ultra 5 to 3.0_BETA last night and got at least 1.5M/s from the onboard
> hme(4) during the upgrade installation. I'm pretty certain I got similar
> performance with 2.0 and 2.0.2.
>=20

 the onboard interface looks good :
 it's connected to my ADSL router (8Mbits).
 it goes up to 680K/s (10baseT full-duplex).

--=20
,- This mail runs ------.
`--------- NetBSD/i386 -'

--RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCtEnt0/VH7L7F7Y4RAmQNAJkBloFAYEPlWdowc2ftH49kYMBJLwCfX8qQ
fuJFBfaXnRbFbA19wImtN+U=
=Oldh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW--