Subject: Re: arch conflict on update
To: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.de>
From: None <sigsegv@rambler.ru>
List: port-sparc64
Date: 03/21/2005 21:47:10
Matthias Scheler wrote:
> In article <423EA1C1.9060700@rambler.ru>,
> 	sigsegv@rambler.ru writes:
> 
>>I think this is because 'uname -m' returns sparc64, even though 
>>everything is 32-bit. How can I override this sanity check?
> 
> 
> Is there a reason why you don't use the safe road by building into a
> destination directory and using "./build.sh ... install=/" afterwards?
> You can also build as a non-root user that way.
> 
> 	Kind regards
> 

I don't understand, this is exactly what I did:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-sparc64/2005/03/21/0002.html