Subject: Re: arch conflict on update
To: Matthias Scheler <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/21/2005 21:47:10
Matthias Scheler wrote:
> In article <423EA1C1.email@example.com>,
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>>I think this is because 'uname -m' returns sparc64, even though
>>everything is 32-bit. How can I override this sanity check?
> Is there a reason why you don't use the safe road by building into a
> destination directory and using "./build.sh ... install=/" afterwards?
> You can also build as a non-root user that way.
> Kind regards
I don't understand, this is exactly what I did: