I reread mail-archive espesially regarding e250, and it seems that it
might be better to try the same kernel which was used there. Is it?

At this point I don't know what is better way to proceed: 
should patches from e250 attempts be applied or should I just
remove that panic. Anything for debugging?

And also I don't understand why 1.5 release kernel doesn't have
this problem. 

	Andrey


On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, matthew green wrote:

>    com0 at ebus0 addr 3803f8-3803ff ipl 60panic: ino 60
>    kdb breakpoint at 125cc08
>    Stopped in pid 0 (swapper) at   cpu_Debugger+0x4:       nop
>    db> 
> 
> 
> 
> this is actually a known problem that i am in the middle of trying to
> solve.  i have a solution, but my ethernet stops working with it.
> 
> you could 'fix' it by removing the if () panic() that causes this
> in psycho.c:psycho_intr_map()... it's a bogus panic anyway, created
> by my misunderstanding of interrupt issues on PCI machines.  that
> should get rid of the panic and it might even work.
> 
> 
> .mrg.
>