> 
>    I had a go with the sparc64 port on an E250 back in August (1.5A?) 
>    with  kernel boot failures in the network interface driver code.
>    
>    Now I've got problems (1.5Q) with the psycho code on a
>    new E250. Does that make sense? Should E250's work effortlessly 
>    now or are there still holes in the device support? 
>    
>    I might be able to provide debugging feedback on an
>    irregular basis if this is considered useful.
> 
> 
> could you post the boot messages?

after some considerable delay, yes. This machine is being configured
as a production server so I've got to work in between the installation
steps and run diskless.

Thanks
Mark