Re: ntpd wedged by libc?

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Mar 10,  9:37pm, agcarver+netbsd%acarver.net@localhost (AGC) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: ntpd wedged by libc?

| On 3/10/2012 20:14, Dave Hart wrote:
| > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:14, Christos 
Zoulas<christos%zoulas.com@localhost>  wrote:
| >> On Mar 10,  2:56pm, agcarver+netbsd%acarver.net@localhost (AGC) wrote:
| >> | Well, that didn't take long:
| >> |
| >>
| >> Hmm, does not seem to leak for me. Here's how I tested it:
| >
| > Thanks for trying.   A question and a suggestion below.
| >
| >
| > Assuming you're testing this on sparc32, is it necessary to byte-swap
| > with be64toh()?  Did you verify, for example, that the last value in
| > the log interpreted as a double is -4.2612301185727119?

It is portable to do it this way. I am testing on amd64. I have sparc64 but
no sparc32.

| > You might be able to tickle it by changing this to:
| >
| > fprintf(fp, "%g %.2f %.3f", u.d, u.d, u.d);

Will try, thanks!

christos