[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ntpd wedged by libc?
On Mar 10, 9:37pm, agcarver+netbsd%acarver.net@localhost (AGC) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: ntpd wedged by libc?
| On 3/10/2012 20:14, Dave Hart wrote:
| > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:14, Christos
| >> On Mar 10, 2:56pm, agcarver+netbsd%acarver.net@localhost (AGC) wrote:
| >> | Well, that didn't take long:
| >> |
| >> Hmm, does not seem to leak for me. Here's how I tested it:
| > Thanks for trying. A question and a suggestion below.
| > Assuming you're testing this on sparc32, is it necessary to byte-swap
| > with be64toh()? Did you verify, for example, that the last value in
| > the log interpreted as a double is -4.2612301185727119?
It is portable to do it this way. I am testing on amd64. I have sparc64 but
| > You might be able to tickle it by changing this to:
| > fprintf(fp, "%g %.2f %.3f", u.d, u.d, u.d);
Will try, thanks!
Main Index |
Thread Index |