Subject: Re: Dual SM50 troubles
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
From: Michael Lorenz <macallan@netbsd.org>
List: port-sparc
Date: 08/01/2007 21:22:51
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Aug 1, 2007, at 14:49, matthew green wrote:

> please note that the problems you describe in -current
> after your fixes remind me of what i've seen on my SS20
> since idlelwp fixes were commited.  i have not powered
> on that machine for too long though.

I'll probably have a pair of SM71 in the not too far future - then we 
can at least tell which problems are related to the missing cache 
controllers on SM50 modules.

> ie, i am not convinced you are now not seeing a more
> general problem with the sparc port.

Neither am I.

Oh, and since I forgot to mention that - to work at all in SMP we still 
need options LOCKDEBUG.

have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBRrEx68pnzkX8Yg2nAQLwtAgAuV2tSH/NulllvNgmBeF7lFr0GXKwhDx2
YAyZEL1zgMKlaubvjuOFEyJR71OopQ13yB1f6S+qnwJm0a8o0hMU83DopYzUsO2z
7SmQ7NEZPu/awn8iJYr0LgFnaPdBMTkDO0dtFGeKWho08xU3KV0pwx9mBQcuK9aA
wFvrB0MHVXYynheE3we0alqOaNudbQPSjXR9DOeKpNexUiBaym79jmQtUZWasZ56
eFKevK+sCWvsykQaTYg3hg73I+wL26icgGjqGbY1lPiyq27IK36GkzBM2tObuHjk
F2JWmx6zRu+nD08/KLajJ5Fbvro06YL0AIoO2kfXVUNKX7QoCOWOwA==
=0q08
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----