Subject: Re: individual hme sbus cards vs quad hme sbus cards
To: NetBSD port-sparc mailing list <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: Julian Coleman <jdc@coris.org.uk>
List: port-sparc
Date: 03/07/2006 10:47:55
> Is there any dis/advantage to using a quad hme card vs individual hme
> cards in terms of throughput for ethernet on a sparcstation 20?
> Silly question perhaps, but, I can set up my firewall system with
> 1 quad or 3 individual cards and, since it's basically all the same to me,
> I'd prefer the highest performance.
Looking at Sun's PCI:SBus Comparison document:
http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/pdf/805-7410-10.pdf
I see that SBUS is 25Mhz, 32-bit maximum and maximum of 100MBytes/s. I
assume your SS20 is running at 25Mhz (I think that some of the older/slower
processor modules want the bus at 20Mhz).
If you want to saturate a single 100Mbit/s interface, you'll need to transfer
200Mbit/s (100 in, 100 out). This is roughly 25Mbytes/s, so a 25Mhz, 32-bit
SBUS in a SS20 can theoretically saturate 4 HME interfaces. However, there
is also software processing to do. I don't know how much CPU you need to run
an HME at 100Mb/s. I could probably test with a single HME.
What data rate do you expect on your 3 interfaces?
J
--
My other computer also runs NetBSD / Sailing at Newbiggin
http://www.netbsd.org/ / http://www.newbigginsailingclub.org/