On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 05:46:19PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 04:40:00PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> > Does anyone know whether the problem/fix applies to sparc64 as well?  
> 
> No, sparc64 is not affected.

Ok, thanks for the verification.  

> I think it would be preferable if someone could track down the
> misoptmized object file (and possibly function, so this could be turned
> into a gcc bug report), since your workaround will cause a severe
> performance hit.

Agreed, that's also why it's put in hacks.mk :-).  But I'd prefer the
workaround to be committed in the meantime, because the package is
otherwise broken on sparc.  

	Geert