Subject: Re: Endless tape?
To: None <mjacob@feral.com>
From: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca>
List: port-sparc
Date: 07/31/2003 16:04:43
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes:
Matthew> You have to set an option to get early warning detection-
Matthew> ST_ENABLE_EARLYWARN in your kernel config file, or use 'mt'
Matthew> to set it. Otherwise you go to hard physical EOT.
Matthew> This was a requirement forced on me.
This sounds dumb and counter intuitive. I have two tape drives here
... one DDS-4 and one 8mil (the 20 Gig native version). They're both
fairly advanced units that cover off a whole bunch of standards.
In a past life, I used to be the tape support guy for a satillite
imaging package. In my opinnion, the DDS-4 from HP is the most
compliant drive in the industry.
Neither drive _ever_ signal hard end-of-tape. Left alone, they simply
lock up the system with endless console messages.
How is this a desireable thing? How is this an even somewhat
desireable default?
This is just one more thing reminding me why I don't use NetBSD. I
respect it. I like many things about it... but the committee making
decisions like this is goofball.
I hate to rant, but in the interim, I bought a SCSI card for my intel
(FreeBSD) box and got my work done.
Dave.
--
============================================================================
|David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be |
|Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they |
|http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. |
=========================================================GLO================