Subject: Re: sparc GENERIC and NFS_BOOT_BOOTPARAM versus NFS_BOOT_DHCP
To: NetBSD/sparc Discussion List <port-sparc@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@netbsd.org>
List: port-sparc
Date: 06/09/2003 10:18:51 
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:13:41AM +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote:
  | FWIW: I find that dhcp & tftp is far more reliable that bootparams,
  | and far easier to debug; rpc.bootparamd in NetBSD has sub optimal
  | diagnostics.  (Mind you, I found that a NetBSD/i386 box running
  | rpc.bootparamd was the only way I could get a Solaris/x86 box to
  | NetBSD a few years ago - the bootparamd on Solaris/sparc would not

s/NetBSD/netboot/.   (fingers hardwired to the former :)

  | work for me at that time).