In article <20020903195533.GA382@antioche.eu.org>
bouyer@antioche.eu.org wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:15:09AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:

> > I think only ESP100 has the problem. How about this patch?
 :
> scsipi will think the adapter can do tagged queuing while that's not true.
> This one is probably better

If ESP100 cannot handle tagged queuing at all, your patch is better.
But it is actually implemented even on ESP100 (which doesn't have SELATN3)
by using SELATNS command. My patch meant:
"It should be supported, but disabled temporarily."
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp