[ On Monday, September 2, 2002 at 21:33:36 (+0200), Manuel Bouyer wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: which would handle nat better
>
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:15:11PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > 
> > Speaking of stability, well, NetBSD-16 may have some serious stability
> > problems on the IPC, if I understand correctly -- i.e. if the IPC has
> > the same cache flush problems as the SS-1 and SS-1+ then it'll crash
> > larger programs regularly.  See the recent "1.6 woes (pmap vs. UBC?)"
> > thread.
> 
> Yes. However I used one as IPF/NAT router for months without problems.
> The stability problem affects userland program; routing happens all in
> kernel.

Ah, yes of course!
 
-- 
								Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;            <g.a.woods@ieee.org>;           <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>