Subject: Re: Rehash: XFree86 Compiled on NetBSD/Sparc
To: NetBSD/sparc Discussion List <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: port-sparc
Date: 08/13/2002 23:49:58
> Maybe it makes some sense for sparc64 in order to support a wider
> variety of display cards, but perhaps not for any sbus sparcs where
> all the necessary drivers are already in the kernel where they
> belong.
Indeed? So what's the kernel-provided API to use the line-drawing
hardware on a cg6? Or the blitter?
> That's the wacked out part. As I understand it XFree86 is broken by
> design. It cannot understand a proper framebuffer device driver and
> thinks it wants direct access to the hardware itself.
When it comes to probing buses, I agree with you.
When it comes to talking to the framebuffer, I disagree with you. I do
not believe it would be acceptable to pay a syscall price for every
framebuffer operation.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B