Subject: Re: 1.6 woes (pmap vs. UBC?)
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Rick Kelly <email@example.com>
Date: 08/08/2002 02:28:46
der Mouse said:
>That may be why. I had "older" machines that were stable too, but only
>the lightly loaded ones. Does it survive a "make build" (or build.sh,
>if that was there in 1.5.2)?
>I never saw the _kernel_ crash, only userland processes. And in some
>circumstances, you may not even notice, or write it off as a random
>application failure (I did that with the X server at the time of the
>crashes I mentioned; it was only later, in retrospect, that I realized
>that X on other machines wasn't doing it).
I have an SS1 that went from 1.5 to 1.5.3 by make build at every increment
of the OS. I use it as a light mailing list machine. No core dumps, but
I don't run X on the box.
Rick Kelly firstname.lastname@example.org www.rmkhome.com